RabbitMQvsRustDesk Server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RabbitMQ | RustDesk Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Message Broker | #4 of 22 in Remote Desktop |
| GitHub stars | 13 949 | 10 627 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +78 | +178 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 2 |
| Latest release | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 | 1.1.16 · 20 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
RabbitMQ scores 77/100 against 75/100 for RustDesk Server, so it is the safer default.
RabbitMQ ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for RustDesk Server.
If you want the quickest setup, RustDesk Server is easier to run; RabbitMQ needs more configuration.
RustDesk Server is growing faster right now (+178 stars in 30 days).
RabbitMQ details →RustDesk Server details →
Swap a project
Keep RabbitMQ, compare it with
Keep RustDesk Server, compare it with