R2RvsVert
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| R2R | Vert | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 7 in RAG | #2 of 10 in File Conversion |
| GitHub stars | 8 049 | 16 175 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +542 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Vert scores 71/100 against 59/100 for R2R, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Vert is easier to run; R2R needs more configuration.
Vert is growing faster right now (+542 stars in 30 days).
Swap a project
Keep R2R, compare it with
Keep Vert, compare it with