QuickstartvsStash
Two self-hosted Media Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Quickstart | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #60 of 142 in Media Management | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 206 | 13 308 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +302 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 7 |
| Latest release | v0.10.16 · 26 Oct 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 52/100 for Quickstart, so it is the safer default.
Quickstart ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; Quickstart needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).
Quickstart details →Stash details →All Media Management projects →