cobaltvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| cobalt | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 45 in Download Management | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 45 591 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 807 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Svelte | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
cobalt scores 83/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for cobalt.
If you want the quickest setup, cobalt is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
cobalt is growing faster right now (+1 807 stars in 30 days).
cobalt details →Windows ARM details →