QtapvsZabbix
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Qtap | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 465 | 6 519 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +108 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Go Template |
Which one should you pick?
Zabbix scores 75/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.
Zabbix is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).
Qtap details →Zabbix details →