QtapvsSRS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Qtap | SRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 1 465 | 29 391 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +112 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 13 |
| Latest release | — | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | C |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.
SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Qtap.
If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; Qtap needs more configuration.
SRS is growing faster right now (+112 stars in 30 days).