QtapvsShinobi
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Qtap | Shinobi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #3 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 1 465 | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | — |
Which one should you pick?
Shinobi scores 66/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.
Qtap details →Shinobi details →