QtapvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Qtap | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 465 | 45 030 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 629 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 34 |
| Latest release | — | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Qtap.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; Qtap needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 629 stars in 30 days).
Qtap details →Reactive Resume details →