QtapvsRadarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Qtap | Radarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #3 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 465 | 14 671 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +240 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 19 |
| Latest release | — | v7.0.0.10815 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | C |
Which one should you pick?
Radarr scores 78/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.
Radarr ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Qtap.
If you want the quickest setup, Radarr is easier to run; Qtap needs more configuration.
Radarr is growing faster right now (+240 stars in 30 days).
Qtap details →Radarr details →