QMReadervsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| QMReader | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #41 of 85 in Feed Reader | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 261 | 13 309 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +299 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.0.14 · 28 Oct 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 47/100 for QMReader, so it is the safer default.
QMReader ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; QMReader needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+299 stars in 30 days).
QMReader details →Stash details →