qm-musicvsWindowsinDocker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qm-music | WindowsinDocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 588 | 53 715 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +330 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; WindowsinDocker needs more configuration.
WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+330 stars in 30 days).
qm-music details →WindowsinDocker details →
Swap a project
Keep qm-music, compare it with
Keep WindowsinDocker, compare it with