qm-musicvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qm-music | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 589 | 93 053 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +1 259 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 19 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 259 stars in 30 days).
qm-music details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep qm-music, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with