qm-musicvsTrilium Notes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qm-music | Trilium Notes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming | #2 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 588 | 38 609 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +634 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 14 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 | v0.106.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Trilium Notes scores 83/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
Trilium Notes ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.
If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; Trilium Notes needs more configuration.
Trilium Notes is growing faster right now (+634 stars in 30 days).
qm-music details →Trilium Notes details →
Swap a project
Keep qm-music, compare it with
Keep Trilium Notes, compare it with