qm-musicvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qm-music | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 588 | 24 053 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +775 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+775 stars in 30 days).
qm-music details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep qm-music, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with