QloAppsvsZabbix
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| QloApps | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Scheduling & Booking | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 14 452 | 6 521 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +66 | +109 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | OSL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Go Template |
Which one should you pick?
Zabbix scores 75/100 against 68/100 for QloApps, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, QloApps is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.
QloApps details →Zabbix details →
Swap a project
Keep QloApps, compare it with
Keep Zabbix, compare it with