QloAppsvsUmbraco CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| QloApps | Umbraco CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Scheduling & Booking | #7 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 451 | 5 278 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +66 | +23 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 27 |
| Latest release | — | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | OSL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | C |
Which one should you pick?
Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 68/100 for QloApps, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for QloApps.
If you want the quickest setup, QloApps is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.
QloApps is growing faster right now (+66 stars in 30 days).
QloApps details →Umbraco CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep QloApps, compare it with
Keep Umbraco CMS, compare it with