QloAppsvsTypesense
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| QloApps | Typesense | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Scheduling & Booking | #6 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 14 452 | 27 063 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +66 | +470 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 |
| Latest release | — | v30.2 · 19 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | OSL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | C |
Which one should you pick?
Typesense scores 79/100 against 68/100 for QloApps, so it is the safer default.
Typesense ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for QloApps.
If you want the quickest setup, Typesense is easier to run; QloApps needs more configuration.
Typesense is growing faster right now (+470 stars in 30 days).
QloApps details →Typesense details →
Swap a project
Keep QloApps, compare it with
Keep Typesense, compare it with