QloAppsvsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| QloApps | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Scheduling & Booking | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 14 452 | 47 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +66 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | OSL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 68/100 for QloApps, so it is the safer default.
Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for QloApps.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; QloApps needs more configuration.
QloApps is growing faster right now (+66 stars in 30 days).
QloApps details →Text Generation WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep QloApps, compare it with
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with