Qinglongvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Qinglong | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 34 in Task Management | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 20 027 | 114 285 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +3 537 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 8 |
| Latest release | upgrade-master · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 69/100 for Qinglong, so it is the safer default.
supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Qinglong.
If you want the quickest setup, Qinglong is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 537 stars in 30 days).
Qinglong details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep Qinglong, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with