qdrantvsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qdrant | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Vector Database | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 35 300 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +529 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Java |
Which one should you pick?
qdrant scores 82/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
qdrant is growing faster right now (+529 stars in 30 days).
qdrant details →Scada-LTS details →