qBittorrentvsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qBittorrent | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Bittorrent | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 41 203 | 47 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +911 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 |
| Latest release | release-5.3.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
qBittorrent scores 84/100 against 76/100 for Text Generation WebUI, so it is the safer default.
Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for qBittorrent.
qBittorrent is growing faster right now (+911 stars in 30 days).
qBittorrent details →Text Generation WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep qBittorrent, compare it with
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with