AriaNgvsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AriaNg | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 45 in Download Management | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 13 264 | 47 726 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +62 | +19 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 10 |
| Latest release | 1.3.15 · 5 Oct 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 69/100 for AriaNg, so it is the safer default.
Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for AriaNg.
AriaNg is growing faster right now (+62 stars in 30 days).
AriaNg details →Text Generation WebUI details →