qBittorrentvsstable-diffusion-webui
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qBittorrent | stable-diffusion-webui | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 89/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Bittorrent | #1 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 41 201 | 165 172 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +909 | +67 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 0 |
| Latest release | release-5.3.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
stable-diffusion-webui scores 89/100 against 84/100 for qBittorrent, so it is the safer default.
qBittorrent ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for stable-diffusion-webui.
If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent is easier to run; stable-diffusion-webui needs more configuration.
qBittorrent is growing faster right now (+909 stars in 30 days).
qBittorrent details →stable-diffusion-webui details →
Swap a project
Keep qBittorrent, compare it with
Keep stable-diffusion-webui, compare it with