qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)vsTrilium Notes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) | Trilium Notes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Torrent | #2 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 758 | 38 604 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +648 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 52 | 14 |
| Latest release | 5.3.0_v2.1.2-ls485 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.106.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Dockerfile | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Trilium Notes scores 83/100 against 67/100 for qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io), so it is the safer default.
qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) ships more often: 52 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Trilium Notes.
If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) is easier to run; Trilium Notes needs more configuration.
Trilium Notes is growing faster right now (+648 stars in 30 days).
qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) details →Trilium Notes details →