qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)vsToolJet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) | ToolJet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Torrent | #1 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 1 759 | 41 141 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +154 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 52 | 76 |
| Latest release | 5.3.0_v2.1.2-ls485 · 25 Oct 2026 | v3.20.251-lts · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Dockerfile | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
ToolJet scores 77/100 against 67/100 for qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io), so it is the safer default.
ToolJet ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 52 for qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io).
If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) is easier to run; ToolJet needs more configuration.
ToolJet is growing faster right now (+154 stars in 30 days).
qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) details →ToolJet details →