qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)vsstable-diffusion-webui
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) | stable-diffusion-webui | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 89/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Torrent | #1 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 1 758 | 165 170 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +79 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 52 | 0 |
| Latest release | 5.3.0_v2.1.2-ls485 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Dockerfile | Python |
Which one should you pick?
stable-diffusion-webui scores 89/100 against 67/100 for qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io), so it is the safer default.
qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) ships more often: 52 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for stable-diffusion-webui.
If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) is easier to run; stable-diffusion-webui needs more configuration.
stable-diffusion-webui is growing faster right now (+79 stars in 30 days).
qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) details →stable-diffusion-webui details →