pyroscopevsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| pyroscope | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 11 711 | 17 183 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.4.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
pyroscope scores 73/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.
pyroscope ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
pyroscope is growing faster right now (+42 stars in 30 days).
pyroscope details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep pyroscope, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with