PulsevsApache Tika
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pulse | Apache Tika | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #1 of 2 in Data Extraction |
| GitHub stars | 6 973 | 4 114 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +232 | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 43 | 0 |
| Latest release | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Pulse scores 71/100 against 68/100 for Apache Tika, so it is the safer default.
Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Tika.
If you want the quickest setup, Pulse is easier to run; Apache Tika needs more configuration.
Pulse is growing faster right now (+232 stars in 30 days).
Pulse details →Apache Tika details →
Swap a project
Keep Pulse, compare it with
Keep Apache Tika, compare it with