PulsevsShinobi
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pulse | Shinobi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #3 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 6 970 | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +229 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 43 | 0 |
| Latest release | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | — |
Which one should you pick?
Pulse scores 71/100 against 66/100 for Shinobi, so it is the safer default.
Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Shinobi.
If you want the quickest setup, Pulse is easier to run; Shinobi needs more configuration.
Pulse is growing faster right now (+229 stars in 30 days).
Pulse details →Shinobi details →
Swap a project
Keep Pulse, compare it with
Keep Shinobi, compare it with