PulsevsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pulse | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 6 973 | 35 794 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +232 | +869 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 43 | 28 |
| Latest release | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 71/100 for Pulse, so it is the safer default.
Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 28 for SeaweedFS.
If you want the quickest setup, Pulse is easier to run; SeaweedFS needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+869 stars in 30 days).
Pulse details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep Pulse, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with