PufferPanelvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PufferPanel | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 62 in Game Servers | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 762 | 93 024 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +15 | +1 277 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 19 |
| Latest release | v3.0.9 · 14 Jul 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 63/100 for PufferPanel, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for PufferPanel.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; PufferPanel needs more configuration.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 277 stars in 30 days).
PufferPanel details →uptime-kuma details →