Prysmvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Prysm | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 18 in Blockchain | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 3 790 | 24 052 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +774 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 |
| Latest release | v7.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 65/100 for Prysm, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Prysm.
temporal is growing faster right now (+774 stars in 30 days).
Prysm details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep Prysm, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with