PrysmvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Prysm | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 18 in Blockchain | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 3 790 | 35 795 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +834 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 28 |
| Latest release | v7.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 65/100 for Prysm, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Prysm.
If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; Prysm needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+834 stars in 30 days).
Prysm details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep Prysm, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with