Bitcoin CorevsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Bitcoin Core | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 42 in Cryptocurrency | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 90 527 | 35 794 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +287 | +869 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 28 |
| Latest release | v29.5 · 26 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Bitcoin Core scores 86/100 against 81/100 for SeaweedFS, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Bitcoin Core.
If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; Bitcoin Core needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+869 stars in 30 days).
Bitcoin Core details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep Bitcoin Core, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with