Proxmox Kubernetes EnginevsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Proxmox Kubernetes Engine | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 244 | 45 030 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 629 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 35 |
| Latest release | v0.0.7 · 13 Sept 2026 | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | — | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 41/100 for Proxmox Kubernetes Engine, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Proxmox Kubernetes Engine.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; Proxmox Kubernetes Engine needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 629 stars in 30 days).
Proxmox Kubernetes Engine details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep Proxmox Kubernetes Engine, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with