actions-runner-controllervsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| actions-runner-controller | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 28 in CI/CD | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 612 | 45 002 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +95 | +1 629 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 34 |
| Latest release | gha-runner-scale-set-0.15.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 71/100 for actions-runner-controller, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for actions-runner-controller.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; actions-runner-controller needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 629 stars in 30 days).
actions-runner-controller details →Reactive Resume details →