ProliferatevsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Proliferate | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #52 of 124 in AI | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 519 | 45 067 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 666 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 35 |
| Latest release | proliferate-v0.4.29 · 27 Aug 2026 | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 49/100 for Proliferate, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Proliferate.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; Proliferate needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 666 stars in 30 days).
Proliferate details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep Proliferate, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with