Project N.O.M.A.D.vsself-hosted-livesync-server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Project N.O.M.A.D. | self-hosted-livesync-server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 42 in Knowledge Management | #37 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 41 160 | 274 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 946 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.35.1 · 5 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Project N.O.M.A.D. scores 85/100 against 45/100 for self-hosted-livesync-server, so it is the safer default.
Project N.O.M.A.D. ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for self-hosted-livesync-server.
Project N.O.M.A.D. is growing faster right now (+2 946 stars in 30 days).
Project N.O.M.A.D. details →self-hosted-livesync-server details →
Swap a project
Keep Project N.O.M.A.D., compare it with
Keep self-hosted-livesync-server, compare it with