private-gptvsWinter CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| private-gpt | Winter CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in LLM Integration | #16 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 57 613 | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +84 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.0.1 · 18 Jun 2026 | v1.2.14 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
private-gpt scores 81/100 against 62/100 for Winter CMS, so it is the safer default.
Winter CMS ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for private-gpt.
If you want the quickest setup, private-gpt is easier to run; Winter CMS needs more configuration.
private-gpt is growing faster right now (+84 stars in 30 days).
private-gpt details →Winter CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep private-gpt, compare it with
Keep Winter CMS, compare it with