PrintStashvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PrintStash | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 22 in 3D Printing | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 234 | 114 309 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +3 561 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 8 |
| Latest release | v0.15.1 · 29 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 49/100 for PrintStash, so it is the safer default.
PrintStash ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, PrintStash is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 561 stars in 30 days).
PrintStash details →supabase details →