Print Farm ManagervsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Print Farm Manager | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #17 of 22 in 3D Printing | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 215 | 56 876 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +147 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.0.0 · 2 Jul 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 47/100 for Print Farm Manager, so it is the safer default.
Typst ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Print Farm Manager.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; Print Farm Manager needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+147 stars in 30 days).
Print Farm Manager details →Typst details →