Print Farm Managervstidb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Print Farm Manager | tidb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #17 of 22 in 3D Printing | #4 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 215 | 40 687 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +100 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.0.0 · 2 Jul 2026 | v8.5.8 · 27 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
tidb scores 80/100 against 47/100 for Print Farm Manager, so it is the safer default.
tidb ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Print Farm Manager.
If you want the quickest setup, Print Farm Manager is easier to run; tidb needs more configuration.
tidb is growing faster right now (+100 stars in 30 days).
Print Farm Manager details →tidb details →