Print Farm ManagervsTasmota
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Print Farm Manager | Tasmota | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #17 of 22 in 3D Printing | #3 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 215 | 24 940 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +167 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.0.0 · 2 Jul 2026 | v16.0.0 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | C |
Which one should you pick?
Tasmota scores 79/100 against 47/100 for Print Farm Manager, so it is the safer default.
Tasmota ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Print Farm Manager.
If you want the quickest setup, Print Farm Manager is easier to run; Tasmota needs more configuration.
Tasmota is growing faster right now (+167 stars in 30 days).
Print Farm Manager details →Tasmota details →