Print Farm Managervssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Print Farm Manager | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #17 of 22 in 3D Printing | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 215 | 114 302 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 554 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.0.0 · 2 Jul 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 47/100 for Print Farm Manager, so it is the safer default.
supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Print Farm Manager.
If you want the quickest setup, Print Farm Manager is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 554 stars in 30 days).
Print Farm Manager details →supabase details →