Print Farm ManagervsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Print Farm Manager | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #17 of 22 in 3D Printing | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 215 | 45 045 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 644 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 35 |
| Latest release | v1.0.0 · 2 Jul 2026 | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 47/100 for Print Farm Manager, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Print Farm Manager.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 644 stars in 30 days).
Print Farm Manager details →Reactive Resume details →