pretalxvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| pretalx | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Conference Management | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 954 | 45 012 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +1 611 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 34 |
| Latest release | v2026.2.1 · 8 Jul 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 62/100 for pretalx, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for pretalx.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; pretalx needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 611 stars in 30 days).
pretalx details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep pretalx, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with