OpenSlidesvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenSlides | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Conference Management | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 661 | 45 021 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +15 | +1 620 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 34 |
| Latest release | 4.3.6 · 20 Oct 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 56/100 for OpenSlides, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for OpenSlides.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; OpenSlides needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 620 stars in 30 days).
OpenSlides details →Reactive Resume details →