PowerSync ServicevsVert
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PowerSync Service | Vert | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #35 of 40 in Database Management | #2 of 10 in File Conversion |
| GitHub stars | 397 | 16 175 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +542 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.27.2 · 24 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Vert scores 71/100 against 49/100 for PowerSync Service, so it is the safer default.
PowerSync Service ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Vert.
If you want the quickest setup, Vert is easier to run; PowerSync Service needs more configuration.
Vert is growing faster right now (+542 stars in 30 days).
PowerSync Service details →Vert details →
Swap a project
Keep PowerSync Service, compare it with
Keep Vert, compare it with