PostHogvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PostHog | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in Analytics | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 40 499 | 35 794 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +580 | +833 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3506 | 28 |
| Latest release | agent-skills-v0.3896.0 · 29 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
PostHog and SeaweedFS score the same (81/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
PostHog ships more often: 3506 stable releases in the past year, against 28 for SeaweedFS.
If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; PostHog needs more configuration.
PostHog details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep PostHog, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with