SeaweedFSvsUmami
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SeaweedFS | Umami | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 35 794 | 39 754 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +869 | +773 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 | 13 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Umami scores 85/100 against 81/100 for SeaweedFS, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Umami.
If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; SeaweedFS needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS details →Umami details →